Explore Issue Areas

  • Aging
  • Agriculture and Food
  • Animal Welfare
  • Arts and Culture
  • Athletics and Sports
  • Children and Youth
  • Civil Society
  • Community and Economic Development
  • Computers and Technology
  • Consumer Protection
  • Crime and Safety
  • Disabilities
  • Education and Literacy
  • Employment and Labor
  • Energy and Environment
  • LGBTQI
  • Government Reform
  • Health
  • Housing and Homelessness
  • Human Rights and Civil Liberties
  • Humanitarian and Disaster Relief
  • Hunger
  • Immigration
  • International Development
  • Journalism and Media
  • Men
  • Nonprofits and Philanthropy
  • Parenting and Families
  • Peace and Conflict
  • Poverty
  • Prison and Judicial Reform
  • Race and Ethnicity
  • Religion
  • Science
  • Substance Abuse and Recovery
  • Transportation
  • Welfare and Public Assistance
  • Women

Explore Collections

Special Collections are curated collections of research that address a specific topic or research question.

  • IssueLab Results is #OpenForGood

  • Democracy Special Collection

  • Gun Violence Special Collection

  • Immigration Strategies Special Collection

  • Affordable Care Act Special Collection

  • Race and Policing Special Collection

View All

Knowledge Centers are a custom service of IssueLab providing organizations with a simple way to manage and share knowledge on their own websites.

  • New York Foundation Knowledge Center

  • European Foundation Centre Knowledge Center

  • TrustAfrica's African Giving Knowledge Center

View All
Get our monthly emails
  • Help
  • Sign in
  • Upload
  • Issue Areas
  • Collections
  • Services
  • About
  • News

Clear All

FILTER

  • Publication Date

    Date Range

    -
  • Document Type
  • Issue Areas
  • Language
  • Geography
  • Copyright
  • Title Results
  • Related Results

2 results found

RELEVANCY

  • Relevancy
  • A - Z
  • Newest - Oldest
  • Oldest - Newest

No result found

Advances in Juvenile Justice Reform, 2007-2008

Advances in Juvenile Justice Reform, 2007-2008

2009-01-07

National Juvenile Justice Network;

"Advances in Juvenile Justice Reform" catalogs the wide and impressive array of reforms in the field of juvenile justice that occurred over the last year and a half. Highlighted reforms include newly passed state and federal laws, administrative policy changes, judicial decisions, and new funding allocations. The document also includes a new section, "Promising Commissions and Studies," that focuses on a range of government-sponsored efforts which are frequently the precursors to concrete, instituted reform. Specific reforms included in the publication are the closure of large, harmful juvenile prisons; increase in programs that offer community-based alternatives to confinement; strengthened practice standards for juvenile defenders; and additional procedural and substantive protections for youth in and out of court.

How Many Americans Are Unnecessarily Incarcerated?

How Many Americans Are Unnecessarily Incarcerated?

2016-12-09

Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law;

While mass incarceration has emerged as an urgent national issue to be addressed, the reforms currently offered are dwarfed by the scale of the problem. The country needs bolder solutions.How can we significantly cut the prison population while still keeping the country safe? This report puts forth one answer to that question. Our path forward is not offered as the only answer or as an absolute. Rather, it is meant to provide a starting point for a broader discussion about how the country can rethink and revamp the outdated sentencing edifice of the last four decades. This report is the product of three years of research conducted by one of the nation's leading criminologists, experienced criminal justice lawyers, and statistical researchers. First, we conducted an in-depth examination of the federal and state criminal codes, as well as the convictions and sentences of the nationwide prison population (1.46 million prisoners serving time for 370 different crime categories) to estimate how many people are currently incarcerated without a sufficient public safety rationale. We find that alternatives to incarceration are more effective and just penalties for many lower-level crimes. We also find that prison sentences can safely be shortened for a discrete set of more serious crimes. Second, based on these findings, we propose a new, alternative framework for sentencing grounded in the science of public safety and rehabilitation.Many have argued that regimented sentencing laws should be eliminated and replaced with broad judicial discretion. Others counter that this would reinstate a system wherein judges are free to deliver vastly divergent sentences for the same crime, potentially exacerbating racial disparities and perpetuating the tradition of harsh sentences.This report proposes a new solution, building on these past proposals. We advocate that today's sentencing laws should change to provide default sentences that are proportional to the specific crime committed and in line with social science research, instead of based on conjecture. These defaults should mandate sentences of alternatives to incarceration for lower-level crimes. For some other crimes that warrant incarceration, they should mandate shorter sentences. Judges should have discretion to depart from these defaults in special circumstances, such as a defendant's criminal history, mental health or addiction issues, or specifics of the crime committed. This approach is grounded in the premise that the first principle of 21st century sentencing should be to protect public safety, and that sentences should levy the most effective, proportional, and cost-efficient sanction to achieve that goal. It aims to create more uniform sentences and reduce disparities, while preserving judicial discretion when needed. Our proposed sentencing defaults for each crime weigh four factors:Seriousness: Murder, for instance, should be treated as a far graver crime than writing a bad check.Victim Impact: If a person has been harmed in the commission of a crime, especially physically, weight toward a more serious sentence.Intent: If the actor knowingly and deliberately violated the law, a more severe sanction may be appropriate.Recidivism: Those more likely to reoffend may need more intervention. Our findings and recommendations, determined by applying the four factors above to the prison population, are detailed below. (The rationale for these factors and our full methodology is described in Appendix A.)

  • Overview
  • Authors
  • Funders
  • Publishers

13 Related Results Found

Authors (3 )

See All

Funders (8 )

See All

Publishers (2 )

See All

Related Authors Found

Related Funders Found

Related Publishers Found

Related Special Collections Found

Get free, worthwhile monthly emails from IssueLab!

IssueLab
  • About
  • News
  • Services
Join Us
  • Add to Issuelab
  • Open Knowledge
  • Use Our Data
Support
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • ToS

Subscribe to our mailing list

There was an error with registration, please try again
Successfully registered!